Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 2:46 pm
That's today's order from Judges Andrew Hurwitz, Daniel Bress, and Patrick Bumatay: The district court's judgment is vacated, and this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:45 am
.* Senior United States District Judge Frederic Block of the Eastern District of New York says it’s time to end this travesty. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
Advantage of delayed patent prosecution for drafting claims Upon filing a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, your invention receives patent pending status. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated more Department of Education (DOE) “for-profit college” student loan funding rules on June 30. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:05 am
(in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-308 Case name: United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
The following year the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
Particular account had to be taken of the Contracting State’s broad margins of appreciation for both commercial speech and the protection of rights of others. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 5:13 am
Compare Stevens, 559 U.S. at 467, 482 (upholding the lower court’s strict scrutiny analysis using the overbreadth doctrine) with United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
The ordinance itself provides that it will not apply to rental units until a 2009 appellate court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
The ordinance itself provides that it will not apply to rental units until a 2009 appellate court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 4:46 am
" Additionally, Goodyear points out that the limitations period was not at issue in Bazemore because claims brought by the United States were not subject to section 706(e). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
They did in Prus v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 3:39 pm
In Lovelace v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:43 pm
United States. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:23 am
Krishnaiah v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:25 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 9:20 am
United States, No. 10-463L (May 24, 2012), and Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
