Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5481 - 5500
of 9,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am
Kerry 13-628Issue: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in "Israel" on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute "impermissibly infringes on the President's exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him." [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
Reversal would "severely burden in-house counsel and their companies," amicus wrote. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am
”And in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
MagSil Corp. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:38 am
Two amicus briefs also bear mention – the United States in support of the employees and the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:07 am
Illinois 13-5967Issue: Whether a defendant is acquitted for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, where a court grants a motion for directed verdict after the prosecution refuses to present any evidence at trial to the empaneled and sworn jury. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
United States, 132 S. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
CVSG United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
United States, No. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
Your Curmudgeon has just received reliable word that ECUSA and its attorneys intend to ask the United States Supreme Court to review the (interlocutory!) [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
The United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) allows trademarks to be registered on both the Principal and the Supplemental Register. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
But how should the Supreme Court of the United States resolve that question? [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 5:16 am
” Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
