Search for: "Doe 35" Results 5501 - 5520 of 17,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Stu Ellis
  It does not touch any farm programs, and it does not call for increased taxes. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 9:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Here is the rest of the agenda: Day One: Wednesday, May 3, 2011 8:50 – 9:00 PEI welcome & Chairman’s introduction 9:00 – 10:00 Expert panel:  Brave new world – Impact of SEC registration on finance and operations - Creating a culture of compliance - Getting buy-in from the GPs and other key stakeholders - What does it mean to take on the role of a Chief Compliance Officer? [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:04 pm by Dianne Saxe
Section 15(2) of Reg 511/09 changes Section 35(3)(a) of Reg 153/04 (when non-potable standards can be used) from when all properties within 100 m are on a municipal supply to 250 m and have no wells installed for the extraction of ground water. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:34 pm by Steve Sady
Ceballos’s case – the judge does not believe the authority exists to make a recommendation? [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Goldberg Jones
But as age increases so does the percentage of people who remarry. 18-24: 29% of previously married people will remarry 25-34: 43% of previously married people will remarry 35-44: 57% of previously married people will remarry 45-54: 63% of previously married people will remarry 55-64: 67% of previously married people will remarry 65 and up: 50% of previously married people will remarry This number has dropped quite a bit for people under 35. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:39 am by Francis Pileggi
  But, if ownership shifts from one large unaffiliated group of public stockholders to another, that alone does not amount to a change of control. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:23 am by SHG
Does he die for that “failure” to hear? [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Here, the word ‘means’ was not used – and that leads to the a rebuttable presumption 112 ¶ 6 does not apply. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:51 am by Kevin Kaufman
This does not mean imports are bad; it is only an accounting definition. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
 CaptionCall, LLC Writing Opinions: Does the use of Federal Circuit Rule 36 to summarily affirm decisions from the PTAB “without opinion” violate 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm by Peggy McGuinness
., Swedish Group Proceedings Act § 5; Norwegian Dispute Act, Ch. 35, § 35-3(1)(b);  Robert Gaudet, Earth to Brussels: Lessons Learned from Swedish, Danish, Dutch and Norwegian Class Actions, White Paper (July 14, 2008). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Of course, to trigger IPX estoppel, the settling defendant/requester must agree to a consent consent judgement in the district court (not effective in the ITC as estoppel does not apply) that they failed to prove invalidity. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:53 pm by Marco Rossi
The trust agreement provides that until a beneficiary reaches the age of 35, the trustee is authorized to distribute to that beneficiary all or part of the income of his or her trust as required for the beneficiary’s health, education, maintenance, and support and when a beneficiary reaches the age of 35, the trustee is required to distribute currently to that beneficiary the annual income of his or her trust for life. [read post]