Search for: "People v. Part"
Results 5501 - 5520
of 25,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 6:11 am
See, e.g., Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule –… [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
In Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:43 am
The takeaway from Missouri v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:59 am
v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:19 am
See White v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
A classic recent example is Kawartha Lakes (City) v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm
See Chang v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:31 am
The Fourth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 7:49 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:52 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 2:57 am
Ex parte re-exams can be requested anonymously, and that's what happened here. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
(People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:03 pm
Griggs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
As we've discussed in earlier posts on consequential damages, predicting which of your damages will be treated as direct (and allowed) and which treated as consequential (and denied) is like picking the combined ages of the bronze medalists in four-man bobsledding at the 2014 Winter Olympics.At least one judicial decision, FDIC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Georgia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:45 am
Texasrelied in part on both Roe and Casey (although principally employing liberty rather than privacy language). [read post]
