Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 10,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Code § 1030(e)(2)(B). [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:30 am
(b) Damage to the common area. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
[ILB Note] Although the opinion indicates "BAKER, C. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 10:55 pm
(C-62/86 AKZO Chemie v Commission [1991] ECR I-3359). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Proceedings proved difficult b/c the plea may not have been lawful. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:16 am
Véase, Pueblo v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 2:29 pm
Under it, awards would be reported in the Summary Compensation Table on the basis of the grant date fair market value of awards made during the fiscal year being reported. 17 CFR 229.402(c)(2)(v)-(vi). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
If you’re interested, good places to start are Part II-C of the Baude/Paulsen article, and Part I-E of Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
[C.] [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm
[v] (The apparent search for pockets is reflected in the naming of third parties as well. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Feb. 24, 2012), aff'd, 2012 U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
§ 1391(d), confirmed that where a corporation “resides” is where it is incorporated. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
Rothe has a long litigative history dating back to the mid-1990s, when (a) Rothe, owned by a Caucasian female, submitted the low bid of $5.57 million for a contract, (b) another company owned by a Korean-American couple and certified as an SDB bid $5.75 million, (c) Rothe's bid was inflated to $6.1 million using the stated price evaluation adjustment, and (d) the adjustment displaced Rothe as the low bidder. [read post]
