Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 5521 - 5540 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2012, 8:39 am by Ronald Meisburg
  Finally, the Board side stepped the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the… [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
 $500 Fine, Exceeding Forfeiture Amount, Probation Did Not Improperly Penalize Defendant's Trial Right
 United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
Astra offers no convincing reason why Emert does not apply.2 See also Geneva Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Sao Paulo location is the second overseas office for 700-lawyer Proskauer, which has seven offices in the United States and one in Paris. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
  The Memorandum Order in United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05  Cress v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In an 84-page ruling in Discount Tobacco & Lottery, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997) ("obsessive-compulsive disorder," which the court concluded was not sufficiently stigmatized); Doe v. [read post]