Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 5521 - 5540 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 6:36 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The trial court ruled against Gilman on his defamation suit and in Gilman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
Audiovisual Works, DVD Sales, License Agreements, Multilingual Licensing, Subtitles, Copyright InfringementRussian Entertainment Wholesale, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Johnson & Johnson to Stop Manufacturing Drug-Coated Heart Stents Federal Diversity Jurisdiction in Breach of Contract Case Stands; Nomanbhoy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:47 am by Michael B. Stack
Read more…       11th Circuit Appellate Court Rules Government’s Lawsuit Untimely   Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rendered its decision on United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:48 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Tax Court (Tax Court No. 015675-11 BMC Software Inc. v Commissioner of Internal Revenue). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 2:27 pm by Gangemi P.C.
Merril Lynch, 13 CV 1531, Judge Baer rejected motions to compel arbitration filed by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc; and Bank of America Corporation. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Wal-Mart including an analysis of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 pm by WIMS
[#Water, #Wildlife, #Energy, #CA9] Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
The MDMA has further stated that unless the tax is repealed, it will “stifle innovation, harm patient care, and weaken the position of the United States as the global leader in medical device innovation. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Even registering a trademarked term as a domain name, and using it to put up a site criticizing the mark owner, has been held to be protected First Amendment activity in a number of cases (see, e.g., Lucas Nursery & Landscaping, Inc. v. [read post]