Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 5521 - 5540
of 8,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
In short, Sheik emphasized that, because the role of punitive damages is punitive, rather than compensatory, such damages should not be awarded when the person to be punished has died. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Katz v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:50 am
Supreme Court ruling in Katz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:22 am
Ashcroft v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
(1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
In Rehaif v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:11 pm
Are you trying to say you'd have joined Justice Scalia's dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a result of the A2J problem, the majority of law firms are short of clients. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
Justice Burke argued that the Court had said in Rios v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Sir James Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB), Jay J declined to draw an such an inference of serious harm where the contested publication was in a national newspaper. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 7:22 am
MORE: Reader Michael Kennedy writes: Glenn, one short comment. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:15 am
The way they work is nothing short of amazing. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department’s analysis states that since the Supreme Court’s 1910 ruling in Hass v Henkel and its 1924 ruling in Hammererschmidt v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 1:23 pm
During his address, Merchan described People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:28 am
In previous articles we have emphasized the need for an incident response plan (IRP) that can be implemented and executed on short notice. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
This is a classic example of change outside Article V, but one that occurs in a way that is far too messy to be accounted for in these theories. [read post]
