Search for: "A----. B v. C----. D"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 10,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 11:02 am
(iii) The arrangement includes or involves:(a) round trip financing;(b) an 'accommodating party', as defined;(c) elements that have the effect of offsetting or cancelling each other;(d) a transaction which is conducted through one or more persons and disguises the nature, location, source, ownership or control of funds; or(e) an expectation of pre-tax profit which is insignificant in comparison to the amount of the expected tax benefit.The Government seems to be… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:25 pm
§ 1502.22(b)(2); see McAllister, 658 F. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Lopez (D. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:32 am
Some of you certainly remember the Google v Vuitton case decided by the CJEU some years ago now, in 2010, which was a case about trade mark infringement. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
” Fears v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
Il a été retenu que l'expert judiciaire a estimé que les bâtiments, avec un taux de vétusté d'environ 70 %, valaient avant l'incendie 848'600 fr. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:45 am
Guest post by Professor Joshua D. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
Difficulty may arise b/c of confidentiality clauses. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am
After X, C, D, D, A, B and C, we tragically have a face and a name attached to the failure of the legislature to respect and protect women’s rights in Ireland. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
” Mistler v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:40 pm
V. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Walthers, Inc. d/b/a Darda Toys (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Can a forum selection clause prevent patent reexamination? [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 12:26 am
The case law on plausibility in the UK is primarily directed to the sufficiency requirement (Warner Lambert v Actavis (IPKat)), but has also been considered in the context of inventive step (Takeda v Roche (IPKat)). [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:15 pm
§ 42.20(c). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
CJEU rules that ice cream sold as ‘Champagner Sorbet’ can be branded as ‘Champagne’Katfriend Nedim Malovic (Sandart & Partners) reports on a judgement released earlier this week (Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne v Aldi Süd Dienstleistungs-GmbH & Co.OHG, C-393/16) where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) reviewed relevant EU legislation on protected designations of origin… [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm
Social uses are similarly aspirational but less meaningless b/c they have discursive meaning. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:52 pm
When a change of custody affects a child’s established custodial environment, the proponent of the change bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the change is warranted under the best-interest factors in MCL 722.23.The trial court concluded that plaintiff proved by clear and convincing evidence that the change of custody was in the child’s best interests after finding that factors (b), (c), (d), (e), (h), and arguably (l) favored… [read post]
