Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 6,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
There was also a hearing in the case of LCG and others v OVD and others. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
IPSO 18055-23 Rizwan v essexlive.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 18056-23 Rizwan v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), No breach – after investigation 18057-23 Rizwan v getreading.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 14277-23 Booley v birminghammail.co.uk (Birmingham… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am
There is no need to rush through a significant re-write of current U.S. cross-border rules. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:15 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am
” See Ratzlaf v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Google’s problems in China, the controversy surrounding the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Liu Xiao Bo and concerns about the use (or misuse) of defamation proceedings in some countries to silence political rivals or journalists show that freedom of speech issues are not bound by national borders. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
There are no physical borders and thus no notice [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
What about the 96% of the world’s population who are citizens of other countries, living outside U.S. borders. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
The court concluded that the veteran border patrol agent “reasonably suspected that a sport-utility-vehicle with California license plates containing six adult males of apparently Hispanic descent was transporting illegal aliens when the driver changed speeds erratically on a slippery road and the passengers appeared nervous and refused to acknowledge the agent’s attempts to gain their attention. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:35 am
And in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 4:51 pm
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
