Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 13,866
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, in its 2020 Order on the indication of provisional measures in Gambia v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:53 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 9:12 am
In Integrity Advance LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 11:50 am
It is unclear how specific the explanation that the platform provides needs to be, but in any event this process seems likely to impose significant administrative burdens on platforms. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:40 am
KOWALSKI v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Government’s position for the Supreme Court’s review of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Patent Nos. 7,454,909 or 5,983,227) were considered by the Patent Office in during the prosecution of Facebook’s U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Charges were brought and an administrative law judge found Bender had violated a number of USPTO rules. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 10:49 am
” The court, citing City of Albany v Public Employment Relations Board, 43 NY2d 954, said: 1. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm
As the Court observed in Robinson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:48 am
Lawson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided in the week of 10/01/10: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court City of Aberdeen v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
Office of Sergeant at Arms (opinion here). [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
Office of Sergeant at Arms (opinion here). [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
V. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
He conceived the office more along the lines of the British Lord Chancellor, who had administrative and advisory responsibilities beyond the standard judicial diet of deciding cases. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
