Search for: "Key v. State"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 20,034
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2009, 10:19 am
PBM Products v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
Rutledge v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
Stitt and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm
” The key message, which echoes previous announcements by data protection authorities and the Article 29 Working Party, is that data exporters are ultimately responsible for ensuring that transfers comply with the requirements of EU law. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:59 am
Georgia v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:11 am
This article grew out of an amicus brief we filed last year in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:00 am
A Class V injection permit, either from the EPA or a state with an approved program, must be obtained to inject the processed brine. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:00 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 am
But, it continues, the key question is whether “the conduct relevant to the statute’s focus occurred in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Biolase, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm
In Whitten v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
There were three key elements to the decision: 1. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 3:55 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:53 pm
Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
Member States should notify such decisions to the Commission. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 5:24 am
If applicable VCPR requirements as defined by such State do not include the key elements of a valid VCPR as defined in § 530.3(i) of this chapter, the veterinarian must issue the VFD in the context of a valid VCPR as defined in § 530.3(i) of this chapter. 21 CFR § 558.6(b)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:16 am
’ On appeal, the Full Court reviewed the relevant Australian authorities relating to manner of manufacture, commencing with NRDC v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67. [read post]
