Search for: "Line v. State"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 28,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 11:42 am
Rhodes v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:42 am
Rhodes v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:41 am
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced a proposed rule to address air emissions that cross state lines and contribute to ozone and particulate matter pollution in the eastern half of the country. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am
At The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that the court reinstated the state’s “maps for its congressional seats and state House of Representative districts, both of which had been thrown out for discriminating against minority voters, ruling … that the Republican-controlled Legislature’s good faith in adopting the lines should be presumed. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:24 pm
Continuing the line of "things are not always what they purport to be," let me just say that Mega Insurance (1) is not a "mega" (or even large) company, and (2) assuredly does not offer "mega" insurance. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Some rules provide "bright lines," others "fuzzy lines," and yet others, no lines at all. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:40 pm
Some rules provide "bright lines," others "fuzzy lines," and yet others, no lines at all. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am
Georgia State Election Board Rule Challenge (Abhiraman, et al., v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:32 pm
By Patrick ZiepoltIn Bailey v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 6:49 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 1:58 pm
Posting plea deals on line? [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
If a line is not drawn here — at deliberately targeting the grieving parents of a soldier while they buried their son — then there is no line. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Holder and Florence v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:53 am
Delta Air Lines, issued on October 21. [read post]
