Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 5541 - 5560 of 23,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Texas and the other states relied on the "independent state legislature" (ISL) theory that had been tentatively launched by Chief Justice Rehnquist in his concurrence (joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas) in Bush v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Jamie Maclaren
My involvement in the upcoming Vilardell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 11:35 am by pscamp01
(The article is available online, but only for people with access to Wiley’s database.) [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:50 am by Jessica Grigsby
” It seemed that frustration over the small delay of driving behind bicyclists bubbles over into intense resentment for some people. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 10:13 am by Rick Garnett
  Or, they could hold simply that the 1983 Marsh v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
This would be a truth-seeking mission as well as a public service, showing the American people just how corrupt some justices are. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:18 pm
So the only people who have survived the United States' consistent (and heartless) efforts to make sure that these people never collect upon their rightful judgment are plaintiff's children. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:14 pm
This morning I attended the oral hearing for Euro Excellence v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:25 pm
Rather than overruling Thompson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
Recently, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, in the case of Burton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm by Andrew Hamm
Adam Liptak of The New York Times suggests that it is a “pity that Justice Thomas has withdrawn from an important part of the court’s work” and notes that were he “to talk, people would listen. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In 1880, for example, it outlawed the categorical exclusion of Black people from juries in Strauder v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
My thesis is that, for most people, where you stand on preemption is where you sit on the substantive laws being preempted. [read post]