Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 5541 - 5560
of 28,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
" Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has declined to review a lower court decision (pdf download) in Pro Football, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 3:32 am
On the following day, March 27th, the Court will conduct hearings on the second case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 6:00 pm
Recently, a New York State Supreme Court judge voided that legislation, noting that it conflicted with state laws governing property use.In Deborah Pusatere v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative tribunal's… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1367534 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
On the state level, formal constitutional change is persistent and ongoing. [read post]
25 May 2008, 10:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 2:41 am
Cranston J referred to the privacy rights of the children but stated that the Article 8 rights of the children cannot operate as a trump card. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
Godfrey v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 3:18 am
” The disputed partnership agreement contained an arbitration provision, which stated: “Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the arbitration laws of the State of New York. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
All eyes will be on the district court now as the Viacom v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:33 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. and Brown v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
But that was before the Supreme Court decided Walker v. [read post]
