Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 5561 - 5580
of 23,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:04 am
The appellate court granted the writ (People v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
As soon as the Senate votes to confirm, many of the three-hundred-plus people who work at the Supreme Court will ramp up for Justice Kagan’s arrival. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:56 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:38 am
The case is People v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:17 pm
In Mays v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:54 am
In that sitting, Justice Ginsburg had two majority opinions: Florida v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:59 pm
Smith and People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:23 pm
This article will cover Assembly Bill 600, California’s Racial Justice Act (AB 256), Penal Code 1172.1, Penal Code 1170(d) (People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
"Indeed, even if [the defendant] had made an explicit promise that, upon separation, [the plaintiff] would be entitled to 'equitable distribution' of their assets, it would be unenforceable, as it would be contrary to the long-standing law and policy in New York that unmarried partners are not entitled to the same property and financial rights upon termination of the relationship as married people," Justice Gesmer wrote in Ericson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
30 Mar 2021, 12:29 pm
In Armstrong v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:34 am
In Armstrong v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
And Justice McDonald helpfully explains why.I'm on board with that, I guess. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
Only ‘a real risk’, rather than ‘conclusive evidence’ of persons being prevented from having access to justice needed to be proven, and the sharp, substantial and sustained fall in the number of claims warranted the conclusion that a significant number of people who would otherwise have brought claims have found the fees to be unaffordable. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
Trust lands for the Native Hawaiian Nation: Lessons from federal Indian law precedents.Indigenous peoples, the international trend toward legal personhood for nature, and the United States.Foundations of Sand: Justice Thomas's critique of the Indian Plenary Power Doctrine.Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
Trust lands for the Native Hawaiian Nation: Lessons from federal Indian law precedents.Indigenous peoples, the international trend toward legal personhood for nature, and the United States.Foundations of Sand: Justice Thomas's critique of the Indian Plenary Power Doctrine.Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
In Janus v. [read post]
