Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 43,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 11:24 am
What: Electronic Frontier Foundation v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:10 am
The statute expressly states that: A record or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 6:46 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Some state laws also specifically target people with criminal records, often in very broad terms. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" Troester v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Broach & Stulberg, LLP v New York State Dept. of Labor, 195 AD3d 1133,, lv denied, 37 NY3d 914, the Appellate Division explained that FOIL requires that an agency, "in accordance with its published rules, make available for public inspection and copying all records, except those records or portions thereof that" are statutorily exempt from disclosure,* which include materials that, "if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted… [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Broach & Stulberg, LLP v New York State Dept. of Labor, 195 AD3d 1133,, lv denied, 37 NY3d 914, the Appellate Division explained that FOIL requires that an agency, "in accordance with its published rules, make available for public inspection and copying all records, except those records or portions thereof that" are statutorily exempt from disclosure,* which include materials that, "if disclosed would constitute an unwarranted… [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
Virginia, and United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 10:41 am
King; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-94926, 6 pagesAll factors need not be stated on the recordConsideration of every factor need not be stated on the record; however, before permitting a change in a minor child’s legal residence, the court shall consider each of the factors set forth under MCL 722.31(4), with the child as the primary focus in the court’s deliberations, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.Yachcik… [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:16 pm
” In Wright v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:00 am
In The People of the State of New York v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:21 am
The DDR Holdings v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 7:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
The Iowa Lawyers ChapterThe following audio was recorded on February 29, 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
Artrip v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
Two weeks ago, in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
We don’t have time to linger over the fact that the court set a new record by granting cert in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 2:10 am
Equally it considered that s 117B of the 2002 Act does not include criminality as a consideration, though it recognised that this may indirectly become relevant if an individual’s record impacts where they will be, and so where their dependent child will be. [read post]
