Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 5561 - 5580
of 7,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
The Court held that these facts were insufficient to support entry under the emergency exception. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 5:11 am
Staples, 19 A.D.3d 1096 [4d 2005](where the court held evidence sufficient that "while only one person used the knife that inflicted the stab wounds, defendant was part of a group of at least four people who acted with a community of purpose); see also, People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 1:40 pm
[09/24] Thomas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 7:23 am
The dissenters included Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Anthony Kennedy — who was then in the majority more than any other justice. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
Under Title VII, protected religious beliefs are not dependent on whether they are “acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” Thomas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 12:34 pm
Thomas Sullins, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Petitioner): Donald L. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:11 pm
Horne v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:01 am
"] From Justice Frankfurter's concurrence in Dennis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) recently agreed to hear the case South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:07 am
United States - an opinion by Justice Thomas that called for strictly hewing to the language of the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
In Gibbons v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:48 am
The judge held off by relying upon the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in Schlesinger v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:56 pm
In an 1890 case called Hans v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
The justices once again did not act on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm
Earlier this year Michigan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 10:43 am
Regard should he had to the comments of Sir Thomas Bingham MR (as he was then) in Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] 3 All ER, to the effect that something cannot be unreasonable if it has a reasonable explanation and behaviour in reliance on the judgment of a legal practitioner is not usually regarded as being unreasonable. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:09 am
First up is Utah v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 1:23 pm
In Roach v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
