Search for: "California v. Nevada"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 4:40 am
Cate decided last Monday and Michael Angelo Morales and Albert Greenwood Brown v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:19 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 5:14 am
In 1969, Timothy Leary challenged his arrest for possession of marijuana under the Act; the case of Leary v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
But in a unique habeas case, three Ninth Circuit judges are sticking to their guns in Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
California, 342 U.S. 165 (1952); Jacobson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:17 pm
See Louisiana v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:25 am
Left to right, the Honorable Judges Wallace and Friedland, and the Honorable District Judge AdelmanFacts: Haines and his friend King were charged with transporting two minor females from Nevada to California to work as prostitutes. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:08 am
But if we nonetheless say the crime's not "over" until X gets safely back home, then it seems to me that X can permissibly be charged in California for a crime that occurred in Nevada, since the crime was in "both" places. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
The Democrats still control the Senate (51-D v 46-R) and downtown at White House. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 12:15 am
In JCCrandall, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 8:45 am
In fact, in the case Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:51 am
Cung Le v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Reno v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
Kalologie Skincare Medical Group of California , 2014 WL 953442, at *5 (C.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
” Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
White v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
District Court in Nevada, a suit which continues. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 7:31 am
This charge, named after the 1981 California Supreme Court case People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
In California, the sentence was discretionary, leaving the state courts to figure out exactly what Miller meant. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
