Search for: "Courts v. Smart" Results 541 - 560 of 2,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2007, 8:54 am
District Court for the Western District of Michigan in Grand Rapids for patent infringement based on the sale of the Smart BBQ Silicone Basting Brush Set (initially sold at Kohl's stores at a price of $29.99 but dropped to $5.99 after a warning letter was received).Separately, of recent CAFC cases:In re Reed Elsevier Properties, Elsevier lost an appeal from 77 USPQ2d 1649 on registration of the mark lawyers.com. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:38 am by David Markus
But forget about tough odds the U.S. hockey team faced, Plaintiffs face-off with something even more formidable: the Supreme Court’s holdings long ago in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
Eagle Mine Appeal - The High Court declined to hear the case of Huron Mountain Club v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
  Whoever's writing this is smart, and a really good writer. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Ronald Collins
Barry Friedman’s The Will of the People is a smart recent take on this theme. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:43 pm
 But as I sometimes do, I gave my wife -- who's incredibly smart (and also a law professor who teaches Civil Procedure) -- a factual hypothetical that raised this issue and that did not indicate which way I felt about it. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
But county officials told the sheriff to suspend the program this year after a case out of Los Angeles -- Pack v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:16 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
District Court for the Middle District of Florida by Amy Sanchez and Ashok Kohli, two former employees of Smart Pharmacy. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Eric Goldman
Note that many of these questions could be empirically studied, and the results of those empirical studies could inform smart policy resolutions. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:08 am by Florian Mueller
(Marshall Division), case no. 2:21-cv-376: filed in October; in December, Apple moved to dismiss Ericsson's complaint; next steps: Ericsson to oppose dismissal, Apple to reply, court to resolve motionApple v. [read post]