Search for: "Howard Wasserman"
Results 541 - 560
of 599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
(And thanks to Howard Wasserman for prompting me to talk a little bit about this.) [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent from the court’s decision on Monday to deny review of a lower court’s ruling granting qualified immunity on summary judgment to a police officer who was sued for shooting a suspect, observing that the dissent “highlights the Court’s failure to intervene in this and similar cases in which summary judgment is (erroneously) granted against § 1983 plaintiffs, while… [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 3:58 am
That’s not really an accurate description nor a realistic concern, as Howard Wasserman explains. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Still more commentary comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice; from Adam Winkler at the Huffington Post; at PrawfsBlawg, where posts come from Richard Re, Howard Wasserman (who has four posts on the decision and how it is being implemented), Paul Horwitz, Rick Hills, and Hadar Aviram; from Karl Laird at the Oxford Human Rights Hub; at the Human Rights at Home Blog from Noah Novogrodsky; and from John Culhane for POLITICO. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am
” Commentary on Garland’s nomination and the effect that Garland would have on the Court if he were confirmed comes from Howard Wasserman, who at PrawfsBlawg agrees with Geoffrey Stone that Garland would “move the Court left, but not back to the days of a bloc of six reliably liberal Justices”; Erwin Chemerinsky, who in The Atlantic imagines what it might “mean to have five justices on the Supreme Court who were appointed by Democratic… [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
United States, where a defendant was convicted of violating Sarbanes-Oxley’s ‘anti-shredding’ prohibition by throwing illegally caught fish off his boat”; Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who summarizes the case as one in which, “[i]n a nutshell, the Court concludes that the federal prosecutors exceeded the power the statute gave them . . . and thus there is no need to decide whether Congress exceeded the power the Constitution’s treaty and… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman remarks that “[t]he opinions seemed to look at different facts triggering different analyses. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman ponders some process-oriented questions raised by Vance and Mazars and discusses potential implications for future cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am
Other comments on the argument in Hernández come in two posts at Prawsfblawg from Howard Wasserman, here and here. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
” Howard Wasserman shares his impressions of “RBG,” the new documentary about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:32 am
., 248 N.Y. 339 (N.Y. 1928) Nominated by Howard Wasserman Seconded by Alan Childress Text of the opinion Wikipedia article In probably the most famous case in torts, and perhaps in all of American legal education, railroad passenger Mrs. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Also weighing in on the President’s remarks were David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Joe Palazzolo at the Wall Street Journal Law Blog, Greg Sargent of the Washington Post’s The Plum Line blog, and Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post’s The Right Turn blog. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am
Howard Wasserman analyzes the argument for this blog. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In the immediate aftermath of the decision, Howard Wasserman argued that the Court's position was the best approach in light of the Court's efforts to tighten the definition of jurisdiction in recent years. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:28 am
It started at PrawfsBlawg, with lawprof Howard Wasserman free-riding the coattails of Cornell lawprof Mike Dorf, with the Wass-man noting “Mike share [sic] my view that cameras are a good idea but not a panacea. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am
Howard Wasserman raises some questions about the efficacy of online teaching. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In an excellent analysis of the case for SCOTUSblog, Professor Howard Wasserman noted that repeated instances of laughter interrupted the oral arguments: “Anyone who believes civil procedure is not funny should read the transcript of Tuesday’s argument in Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
Howard Wasserman had this blog’s preview; Michelle Korkhov and Anna Marienko at Cornell also preview the case. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
