Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 541 - 560
of 13,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Royal Crown, 127 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1045 (citing In re Steelbuilding.com, 415 F.3d 1293, 75 U.S.P.Q. 1420, 1424 (Fed. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:14 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:06 am
Everybody and their mother has written posts offering tips and advice to those taking the test (see, e.g., Above the Law, The Bar Professors, The Bar Exam Project (these guys are real serious; they even give advice on how and when to pee during the Bar)). [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 12:06 am
See, e.g., Wigand v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
See, e.g. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:34 am
See, e.g. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:15 pm
See, e.g., Song, 2007 U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:16 pm
He admits repeatedly, he in fact proclaims, that he is very dislikable, is a former big time drunk, is a guy with a serious gambling problem, is a man who at times lied to his partner, who in turn lied at times to him or withheld important information from him, is a man who lied to some others too, is a guy who got into physical fights -- brawls, is obsessed with money (one good thing he does, though, is that he translates amounts of money he received for various things in former years… [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
See, e.g., Ind. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 10:48 am
Also, it feels incredibly tailored to his personal obsessions - e.g., his pro-old Hollywood, anti-hippie nostalgia, and his wanting to re-create what a pool party at a Playboy mansion in the late 1960s might have been like - without entirely making the sale to the audience that we should share them at least for the film's duration. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
On the theory that once the sign says don't walk, you're . . . wait for it . . . not supposed to walk.But the Appellate Division reverses. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
If only because you're busy with that whole "criminal arrest" thing. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:06 pm
We're wondering if, there is a copyright on this seemingly non-copyrighted information? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:59 am
No matter what culture you’re from, everyone loves music. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Cir. 2009) (unsworn attorney argument is not evidence and cannot be used to rebut record evidence); see also In re Geisler, 116 F.3d 1465, 1470 (Fed. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:23 am
See, e.g., In re Central Sprinkler Co., 49 USPQ2d 1194, 1197 (TTAB 1998) (ATTIC for “automatic sprinklers for fire protection ” falls within the narrower category of sprinklers for fire protection of attics). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:35 pm
(I'd say "more" for virtually anyone, but if you're only charging $12,000 for an entire litigation, I guess you're probably not charging more for that for defending the appeal, no?) [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:18 am
The FMLA permits an employer to “require that [an] eligible employee obtain subsequent [medical] re-certifications on a reasonable basis. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
See, e.g., Dell Inc. v.Acceleron, LLC, 818 F.3d 1293, 1298 (Fed. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
[See, e.g., the recent REDNECK RACEGIRL decision, In re Covalinski TTABlogged here].In this case, due to the large size of the design element, we find that the design and wording REPUBLIK OF KALIFORNIA work together to create the overall commercial impression described below as a former Soviet state, such that the wording does not dominate the design. [read post]
