Search for: "J. D. v. R. W."
Results 541 - 560
of 912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2008, 5:43 pm
" J. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
Section 2 of the Representation Agreement Regulationdefines routing management of the adult’s financial affairs as follows:2 (1) For the purposes of section 7 (1) (b) of the Act, the following activities constitute "routine management of the adult's financial affairs":(a) paying the adult's bills;(b) receiving the adult's pension, income and other money;(c) depositing the adult's pension, income and other money in the adult's accounts;(d)… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm
Stephanie Plamondon Bair, Brigham Young University J. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
Minnesota: Jennifer R. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Jacob J. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:10 am
W. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
By William W. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Events 16 January 2018, “Various Claimants v W M Morrison Ltd: Opening the data breach floodgates? [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
J 23. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Lanza, Thomas R. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
Gerald R. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
As my organization explained in an amicus brief, the testimony elicited by Buck’s counsel evoked an “enduring racial stereotype that exerts a unique power in this nation,” one that can have a “[d]emonstrable [e]ffect on [p]erceptions and [j]udgments. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
G., Arthur, W. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:36 am
Pronouncing the English alphabet: I used to get students to write the letters in groups according to the vowel sound, like this (this presumes the British pronunciation of Z as zed - if it is pronounced zee, it goes in the second line instead: A H J K B C D E G P T V F L M N S X Z I Y O Q U W R Many thanks to Martina for this report. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
Attorneys and co-hosts, J. [read post]
