Search for: "Jackson v. Smith" Results 541 - 560 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:34 pm by moderator
Jackson]Judge Norma Ogle affirmed a thirty-eight-year sentence for attempted second degree murder and employing a firearm during a felony. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
In the news Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry granted clemency to Richard Tandy Smith. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply brief   Jackson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:35 pm by John Floyd
  Law Enforcement Loves Asset Forfeiture   Jackson County Sheriff A.J. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:11 am by Marko Milanovic
To that extent, as I discuss here, the UK Supreme Court's recent decision in Smith v Secretary of State for Defence, in which it held that UK soldiers do not have rights against the UK under the ECHR when operating outside an area under UK effective control, was in accordance with the principle of universality. [read post]