Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 541 - 560
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2007, 2:35 pm
" As Kent Scheidegger noted in his comments to Lyle's earlier post, Rule 37.6 has been revised to require that a merits amicus brief be filed "within 7 days after the brief for the party supported is filed, or if in support of neither party, within 7 days after the time allowed for filing the petitioner's or appellant's brief. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger laments that in Banister the court “took a small step further down a road it has already traveled too far–bogging down federal habeas corpus cases by making them more like regular civil litigation in federal courts. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Jonathan Adler at the Volokh Conspiracy, Ed Whelan at Bench Memos, and Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences all take note of Hurley’s story and the overrepresentation of the Ninth Circuit on the Supreme Court’s docket. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger “do[es] not see any plausible argument for retroactivity” in Edwards “[u]nder existing precedent. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger questions Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s statement about the amount of time that passed between the enactment of two constitutional provisions. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
” Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences Blog criticizes the article for “exaggerat[ing] the extent of the changes…. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on the debate over whether video cameras should be permitted in the Supreme Court courtroom, suggesting that the court “should not stream its arguments live but instead should make them available on video largely the same way it presently does in audio. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
’” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who asserts that the decision “confirm[s] that the state was right on the question that everyone thought the case was about — whether inability to remember the crime alone exempted a murderer from execution. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
Kent Scheidegger has commentary on the decision at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
” Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
” Commentary on the appointment comes from Christina Cauterucci at Slate’s XX Factor blog, who looks at what Gorsuch’s nomination means for women, arguing that as “far as the health, safety, and civil rights of America’s women are concerned, it’s hard to imagine how the court could do worse”; Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, who maintains that “Donald Trump has managed to pick a nominee who should please everyone other… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Crime & Consequences, to see what sort of lunacy Bill and his partner in crime, Kent Scheidegger, had cooking. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger calls the decision “a win for cops and for looking at evidence as a wall and not a collection of bricks. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:11 am
The number of new death sentences fell dramatically last year and for the last decade have been well below the rate of the 1990s, said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:08 pm
Kent Scheidegger says that this case, the Fort Hood shootings, and the bizarre alleged serial killer in Cleveland are "strong examples of why we need capital punishment. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
Berman suggests that the Court’s resolution of the case “is designed to try to ensure that the ruling ends up not being especially consequential,” while at the blog Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger has two posts (here and here) weighing in on the implications of the “narrow” decision. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am
Commentary comes from William Marshall at ACS Blog, Mark Kende at ACS Blog, Ken Jost at Jost on Justice, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Allen Ides in The Sacramento Bee, Amy Vitale in an op-ed at The Hill, Jeffrey Toobin in The New Yorker, the editorial board of the Los Angeles Times, Stephen Henderson in the Detroit Free Press, William Astore in The Huffington Post, Tony May in an op-ed for Penn Live, Philip Martin in an op-ed at ArkansasOnline, Paul Rosenberg at… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who argues that the critical question in the case “was whether private organizations with pro-defendant agendas … have the power to amend the Eighth Amendment so that states must follow their latest pronouncements, rather than their previous pronouncements, in deciding who qualifies for the no-matter-what exemption,” and that on “this essential point the Court hands us a bowl of… [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
” Kent Scheidegger remarks on yesterday’s denials at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
