Search for: "Kent Scheidegger" Results 541 - 560 of 600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that in Royal v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses last week’s renaming of George Mason University’s law school as the Antonin Scalia Law School, stating that “Justice Scalia was a giant of the law and a leader in producing an important change in direction for our judicial system. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
The ruling Wednesday "should put an end to the de facto moratorium on the death penalty caused by legal challenges to this method of execution," said Kent Scheidegger of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a nonprofit group that supports the death penalty. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Steve Hall
The number of new death sentences fell dramatically last year and for the last decade have been well below the rate of the 1990s, said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger remarks that Friday’s order denying the federal government’s request to move forward immediately with federal executions “may have been a Pyrrhic victory,” because several justices signaled their “impatience” at the prospect of delay in the case; the court of appeals yesterday set an expedited briefing schedule, with oral argument on January 15. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes an editorial in the Los Angeles Times that he says “blatantly misrepresented” a Supreme Court opinion in a 1998 death penalty case; he argues that the editorial “defamed the Court and, even worse, misled its readers on a vitally important public issue they will be voting on shortly. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
”  Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences denounces the advantage that may be gained in the nomination process by judges with former law clerks in politics, as described Tuesday by Jess Bravin in the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 2:09 am
"For Kent Scheidegger, legal director of California's Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, the answer for Floridians is simple:"Justice is sometimes carried out," he said. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger looks at the week ahead at the Court. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger surveys the criminal cases awaiting decision at the court. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:08 pm
Kent Scheidegger says that this case, the Fort Hood shootings, and the bizarre alleged serial killer in Cleveland are "strong examples of why we need capital punishment. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
UPI describes the ruling, and Kent Scheidegger offers his analysis at the Crime and Consequences blog. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger concludes that “the Supreme Court majority and the Eleventh Circuit have correctly interpreted the statute,” and that although “[t]here is surely much room for policy disagreement in this area, … those arguments should be made to Congress. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:44 am
Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the pro-death penalty Criminal Justice Legal Foundation immediately fretted that any moratorium, de facto or otherwise, would dilute deterrence and "cause more innocent people to die".It is, of course, beyond the realms of ridiculous to think that criminals who have until now been reining in their murderous impulses, will have read the court's ruling and, with a sigh of relief, decided they can now go on killing sprees. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am by Jeff Gamso
  Kent Scheidegger, over at Crime & Consequences, thinks it only fair that my clients should be killed. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that the decision was a “stern rebuke” to the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
Kent Scheidegger of the Crime and Consequences Blog criticizes the article for “exaggerat[ing] the extent of the changes…. [read post]