Search for: "Matter of Ross" Results 541 - 560 of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 5:20 am by thejaghunter
Ross, operating as Ross does in the Dictatorship of the Judiciary, ordered me on 28 June 2010 not to report these matters to you (or anyone) under threat of arrest and other punishments. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:05 pm by John Ross
Dissent: Under the majority's standing analysis, "it is difficult to imagine a plaintiff that could challenge transfers like the ones at issue here, no matter how unlawful. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
So poor that the ban flunked the state's rational basis test, a court ruled this week, noting that "every single [state] employee who testified in this case stated that [the ban] is unjustifiable as a matter of food safety. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Eric Miller
 She give's him a flippant answer: her jewelry is "Rick Ross", i.e. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
The facts and circumstances here require us to address this matter of first impression. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 4:45 pm by Russell Knight
“[C]ross-examination is generally limited to the scope of the direct examination. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
” Sheriff Ross, of course, is black. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:45 pm by John K. Ross
Second Circuit: Congress intended to permit the canal funding; no matter that the state did not make this argument until several years into the litigation. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Ninth Circuit: He can sue the then-sheriff (who is facing prison time for unrelated matters). [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:00 pm by John K. Ross
Judge Murguia, dissenting: Fossils are indeed organic matter that become a mineral compound over time, but they are not mined, they are not typically extracted for economic purpose, and they just aren't minerals as the term is ordinarily understood. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:00 am by John K. Ross
Sixth Circuit: Perhaps, but it doesn't matter because federal law permits the city to set whatever terms it wants with whatever contractor it wishes in this instance. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Second Circuit (over a dissent): It's only illegal retaliation if Officer A's crime was "a matter of public concern," and how could any of the retaliators have known whether it was? [read post]