Search for: "Mitchell v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Fortunately, Houston is one of the most resilient cities in the United States, and optimism can be found on every corner. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:22 pm
Colb In my column for this week, I discuss the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
Marzano-Lesnevich, was brought by Roy Innes, whose four-year-old daughter, Victoria, was removed from the United States to Spain, the mother’s native country, in January 2005 without his knowledge or consent. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Sarah Seo argues that Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 8:34 am by Josh Blackman
This position parallels the United States Supreme Court's current approach to the Free Exercise Clause pursuant to Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am by Marty Lederman
 (Attorney General Wirt for instance, opined in 1827 that the President could order the discontinuance of a “vexatio[us]” suit in the name of the United States if it was “wholly unfounded in law. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm by Eric Segall
 Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
In addition to her contribution to that 1st trial before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, we noted,Des Forges also gave expert testimony in national courts, the United Nations, the Organization of African Unity, and the national legislatures of Belgium, France, and the United States. [read post]
The NWPR was enacted during the Trump administration and represents the EPA’s latest attempt to define the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm by Rosalind English
As for Article 2, the Court referred extensively to the Strasbourg case of Osman v United Kingdom , which set out the positive obligations, implied by Article 2, on the state to protect life. [read post]