Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog" Results 541 - 560 of 1,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the court ruled on narrow grounds in favor of a Christian-owned bakery in Colorado that wouldn’t sell a wedding cake to a same-sex couple on the same terms as all other customers. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Mark Hartsoe
Related Blog Posts Tennessee Supreme Court Establishes New Rule for Collateral Estoppel in Civil Lawsuit Based on Injury to a Child Tennessee Had “Most Significant Relationship” with Parties and Accident that Occurred in Florida, Triggering Application of Tennessee Law in Wrongful Death Lawsuit The post Tennessee Appellate Court Identifies Proper Family Member to Bring Wrongful Death Case Following Mother’s Death in Car Accident appeared first on Tennessee Injury… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Mark Hartsoe
Related Blog Posts Tennessee Supreme Court Establishes New Rule for Collateral Estoppel in Civil Lawsuit Based on Injury to a Child Tennessee Had “Most Significant Relationship” with Parties and Accident that Occurred in Florida, Triggering Application of Tennessee Law in Wrongful Death Lawsuit The post Tennessee Appellate Court Identifies Proper Family Member to Bring Wrongful Death Case Following Mother’s Death in Car Accident appeared first on Tennessee Injury… [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:22 am by Leonard L. Gordon and Michael A. Munoz
Second, the Fifth Circuit held that Congress unconstitutionally delegated legislative powers to the SEC without an intelligible principle. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  We have followed the Southern District’s decision granting an injunction as well as the Second Circuit’s reversal of that decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
President Barack Obama has prioritized nominations to the 4th Circuit, which is home to many cases related to national security and civil rights. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:23 pm
Makor Issues & Rights Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007) [see blog article here], plaintiffs’ complaint would survive dismissal “only if a reasonable person would deem the inference of scienter cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference one could draw from the facts alleged. [read post]
16 May 2007, 12:56 pm
By our abacus, that's at least three prosecutors arrested in the short time we have been running the blog. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am by Allan Blutstein
I agree this is good news for requesters . . . in the Second Circuit, at least. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 5:34 am by Guest Blogger
  The opinions that result cannot be cited as precedent in future case and are a form of second-class justice. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:56 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:56 am by Phillips & Associates
Supreme Court first recognized sexual harassment as sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 10:51 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Ginsburg co-founded the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in 1972, and as the project’s chief litigator, argued a succession of gender equality cases before the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 1:32 pm by Guest Author
  Vance appealed only the hostile work environment and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 2:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Second, … Plaintiffs are not required to show that they will win on the merits of their constitutional claims to establish Article III standing. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:47 am
For the past decade she has handled Civil Rights and Discrimination cases against employers for race, nationality, gender, age, sexual orientation and religion. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:17 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Second Circuit found that the defendant’s speech was the sole issue in the government’s case. [read post]