Search for: "State v. Hobbs" Results 541 - 560 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
Nonetheless, the court concluded that the district court did not commit a reversible error where the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:34 pm
For example, the phrase "public reason" is found in Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm by Lawrence Solum
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:00 am by Rebecca Anderson
Hobbs, two cases challenging the constitutionality of sentencing 14 year olds to LWOP for homicide offenses (see http://jlc.org/legal-docket/miller-v-alabama-jackson-v-hobbs). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Zahavah Levine, Thea Raymond-Sidel
Every state has a process for verifying the identity of the voter who casts an absentee ballot. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
”  Similarly, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Florida, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
  (This situation is not confined to the Federal system, either; two years ago in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:22 am by Mack Sperling
A motion on similar facts was denied last week in the case of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company v. [read post]