Search for: "The People v. Strong"
Results 541 - 560
of 6,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”.… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Is there a strong textual basis for the majority opinion? [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 3:04 pm
This was demonstrated in Roberts v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 10:00 am
Jennings v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
If you do read the entire decision, best have a strong stomach. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
[Post by Venkat] Saffold v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
Conclusions There appeared to be a strong case for the implied term, not only because it would be fair, but also without it the break right would operate capriciously. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
Many of these same people likely would become delegates in an actual Article V convention. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 3:43 am
Mr Johnson said he told BBC editors that it was “possible” that the people from South Yorkshire Police whom he met had felt “pressured” to co-operate with him. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 1:45 pm
NSA, and Jewel v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
And here's what I wrote 16 years ago (when GWB needed to fill a Supreme Court seat):Jeffrey Rosen re-airs the topic of "super-stare decisis" -- the notion that the precedential value of some cases is especially strong, perhaps so strong that you ought to have to agree in advance not to overrule them to win confirmation to the Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
Utah v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
It sets out the minimum protections to which people are entitled. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 5:25 pm
The case is Sander v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:57 pm
" Indeed, she has written a number of securities law opinions, including the lower court opinion in Merrill Lynch v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:19 pm
Most people will not notice a difference due to this change. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:12 am
Case citation: Tanner v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:05 pm
The EACJ followed the reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights (Goodwin v. [read post]
