Search for: "UKSC Blog" Results 541 - 560 of 615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO had a blog post “Social media and journalism during COVID-19”. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  There is also a post about these on the Privacy Matters blog. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Hacked off had a blog post “The fake news continues! [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm by Charon QC
” Listen *** The Law blogs… The UK Human Rights blog from 1 Crown Office Row produces yet another thoughtful piece – this time from the pen of Adam Wagner. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
The police may well be justified in seeking the disclosure, on the grounds that they need to plug the holes (see Brian Cathcart on Inforrm’s Blog for a post from their perspective). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
For example, in the Cape Intermediate Holdings v Dring case decided in 2019, the UKSC recommended that the relevant bodies consider the issue of (non—party) public access to court documents. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm by Sam Murrant
First off, a summary of the proposals in the report – try this post by Edward Craven on Inforrm’s blog, which is both thorough and concise, or this post also on Inforrm by Aidan O’Neill QC. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  There was a post on the Volokh Conspiracy blog. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
There is a discussion of the opinion on the Privacy and Information Security Law Blog. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The judge cited Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] UKSC 5 to the effect that the general or legitimate starting point was that prior to charge, a person under investigation for a crime has a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  There was a post on the Brett Wilson Media and Communications Law Blog. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The ICO had a blog piece “Video conferencing: what to watch out for”. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The ICO’s blog had a post “Blog: What’s next for data ethics? [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO’s blog had a post “Opinion pieces and COVID-19 reporting”. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am by INFORRM
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Hence, in Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012) [46] Lord Kerr (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed concurring) held: The particular circumstances affecting the individual whose personal data would be revealed on foot of a Norwich Pharmacal Order will always call for close consideration and these may, in some limited instances, displace the interests of the applicant for the disclosure of the… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege.   [read post]