Search for: "United States v. Nelson" Results 541 - 560 of 877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2017, 1:31 pm
Baer, 973 P.2d 1225, 1231 (Colo. 1999).In the Interest of R.D., supra.The court then took up the First Amendment issue, explaining that theFirst Amendment of the United States Constitution provides that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm by Susan I. Nelson
Proponents of the change advocate amending the Constitution of the United States in order to create an underclass of stateless children. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
§ 1341, in a scheme to defraud the United States Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration of money and property by certifying non-qualifying entities for participation in Kentucky's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ("DBE") program. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 6:10 am by John Jascob
And Plaintiffs conceded below that, unlike AIPTF, other purchasers of ADRs, sponsored or unsponsored, could have purchased on the secondary market in the United States or created newly issued ADRs through conversion of Toshiba common stock already present in the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The United States Supreme Court can’t seem to make up its mind about race. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The commission rejected it and opted for the electric chair.For nearly a hundred years after New York’s decision, no state in the United States authorized lethal injection. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
" Here's the key language from the article:In the 1968 case of United States v. [read post]