Search for: "United States v. Hernandez" Results 541 - 560 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 Once a person becomes a Supreme Court justice, no concern should exist  about being pleasing enough to senators and the president to get onto a higher court (and getting elevated to a higher court or retained on the existing court, when it comes to some state courts,  should not be a concern with any judge on any court); this is the highest court the United States ever has had. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:19 am by Amy Howe
” Thomas devoted most of his opinion, however, to a history of the eugenics movement in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
’” At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen previews Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” For Capitol Media Services (via Pinal Central), Howard Fischer reports that a ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He was a law clerk to United States District Judges Richard A. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
“We’ll be encouraging the United States to really continue and strengthen engagement in our region including economic engagement, which is really critical to our region. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by Charles Roth
United States (full disclosure — I was on the Chaidez team), the court found Padilla non-retroactive. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm by Michael Lowe
  For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]