Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 5581 - 5600 of 13,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2007, 4:18 am
Here is subsection (d), starting on line 42:(d) The office division of state court administration (IC 33-24-6-1) shall administer a program to pay claims for reimbursement under this section. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bill Raftery
He is the chief administrative officer of the judicial system of the state, subject to rules adopted by the court. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:28 am by Susan Brenner
This post examines an opinion the Georgia Court of Appeals recently issued in a civil suit:  Ware v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the court concluded that the statements were absolutely privileged and Supreme Court had properly granted the Defendants' motions for summary judgment.* In Hemmens v Nelson, 138 NY 517, the Court of Appeals explained "From considerations of public policy and to secure the unembarrassed and efficient administration of justice and public affairs, the law denies to the defamed party any remedy through an action for libel or… [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the court concluded that the statements were absolutely privileged and Supreme Court had properly granted the Defendants' motions for summary judgment.* In Hemmens v Nelson, 138 NY 517, the Court of Appeals explained "From considerations of public policy and to secure the unembarrassed and efficient administration of justice and public affairs, the law denies to the defamed party any remedy through an action for libel or… [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 4:26 am by SHG
Adding to the mess, there is the problem of Pearson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:54 am by gmlevine
There is no administrative appeal from a UDRP order, but the aggrieved party has the right to challenge an order denying or transferring the disputed domain name in a court of law. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s blog, Deborah LaFetra comments on the court’s order in Fleck v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 4:24 pm by David Super
 (That opinion was hardly the work of a liberal Court:  five justices in the Wong Kim Ark majority had voted two years earlier to validate racial segregation in Plessy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Meanwhile, the pro-worker’s rights Obama Administration has made enforcement of these rules a high priority. [read post]