Search for: "Grant Connect" Results 5581 - 5600 of 21,861
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
I first blogged the case in 2013 when the lower court granted Yelp’s anti-SLAPP motion; I also blogged it in 2014 when the appellate court reversed the anti-SLAPP motion. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:17 am by Florian Mueller
In other words, it tells the lower courts when to reject the grant of a use-up period. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 7:11 am by John Floyd
Four witnesses said a different person confessed, and evidence connected that person to the scene. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by The Sader Law Firm
You can review VITA sites in Kansas City by visiting Connecting for Good’s website. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:54 am by SHG
See the connection, now that admins are “presiding” like judges and thus susceptible to the “risk” of being sued? [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:31 am by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  Even though Dasta had been delayed, because Dasta had failed to comply with the notice of claim requirement in its contract with Marriott, the court ruled that Marriott’s failure to grant a time extension to Dasta for the delay could not be considered legally wrongful. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:31 am by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  Even though Dasta had been delayed, because Dasta had failed to comply with the notice of claim requirement in its contract with Marriott, the court ruled that Marriott’s failure to grant a time extension to Dasta for the delay could not be considered legally wrongful. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:31 am by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  Even though Dasta had been delayed, because Dasta had failed to comply with the notice of claim requirement in its contract with Marriott, the court ruled that Marriott’s failure to grant a time extension to Dasta for the delay could not be considered legally wrongful. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:31 am by C. Ryan Maloney, Esq.
  Even though Dasta had been delayed, because Dasta had failed to comply with the notice of claim requirement in its contract with Marriott, the court ruled that Marriott’s failure to grant a time extension to Dasta for the delay could not be considered legally wrongful. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:59 pm by Ilya Somin
In addition, like the  court's analysis  of "applicable federal laws," this interpretation of "coordination" opens the door to conditions having little or no connection to the purposes for which the fund were granted. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 pm by Krzysztof Pacula
Against this background, the Opinion confirms, at points 32 et 33, that while the Brussels I bis Regulation contains, in Article 24(5), an explicit rule granting exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the enforcement of judgments to the courts of the Member State in which the judgment has been or is to be enforced, the Maintenance Regulation does not contain any explicit rule on jurisdiction regarding the enforcement of decisions in matters relating to maintenance. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:59 pm by Bill Budington
Even then, the footage was most likely granted once, and subsequent requests would have to be made for more material. [read post]
The Act also makes clear that it excludes the following agreements: (1) non-solicitation agreements concerning customers, vendors, and employees; (2) forfeiture agreements (except for forfeiture for competition agreements); (3) non-disclosure, confidentiality, and invention assignment agreements; (4) non-competes made in connection with a sale of a business where the employee is a significant owner, member, or partner in the entity sold and is receiving significant consideration or benefit… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am by Bona Law PC
That presumption can be rebutted by evidence breaking the causal connection between a price differential and lost sales or profits. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Board considered Auxiliary request 2 not to violate Rule 80 EPC, since granted claims 2 and 9 were each separately dependent upon granted claim 1, found not to be novel; thus, the amendments made to the claims in auxiliary request 2 were occasioned by a ground for opposition. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer, Jack Goldsmith
But it would not in any way afford the president, as the grantor, immunity from commission of a crime in connection with granting a pardon, nor would it cover any such separate crime committed by the grantee. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Cowpasture River Preservation Association, involving the power of the Forest Service to grant rights of way through lands traversed by the Appalachian Trail, for this blog. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 1:58 am by Florian Mueller
As a former anti-software-patent campaigner, I'm particularly sensitive to this, and I believe the European Patent Office granted those claims in violation of the European Patent Convention, but they do come in handy now as they belie Nokia's anti-antitrust-enforcement narrative. [read post]