Search for: "House v. Close" Results 5581 - 5600 of 7,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
However, the second case I read as a law student, the infamous World War II era case of Liversidge v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Surprisingly this nettle has only really been grasped once before, by the House of Lords seven years ago in R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, where the question whether the abuse of process in getting the defendant deported from Zimbabwe to trial in the UK rendered his conviction so unsafe as to qualify him for compensation for miscarriage of justice. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
I forgot to write a post about the right to be forgotten http://t.co/ZUPtq5Xmd4 -> Costs ordered against lawyer who failed to make disclosures in obtaining Anton Pillar order http://t.co/6bem4W4ZT0 -> The Great Grpahic of the Knopf v Levy Access Copyright Debate at Brock U May 29 2014 http://t.co/o2XuRMrMss -> How to Fix Copyright for Older Artists | Future of Music Coalition http://t.co/6OkDm5brKf -> RESPECT Bill Would Put Golden Oldies Under Federal Copyright… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm by Lisa McElroy
Kappos, the patent bar has been watching the Court very closely. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
In the context of the Cold War, and a crisis atmosphere within the White House, Warren again deferred to national security officials. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 6:00 am by Scott R. Anderson
And Congress asserted its support through a pair of recent actions that passed unanimously in the House of Representatives and near-unanimously in the Senate. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am by Cyberleagle
” This refers to the judgment of the House of Lords in the Naomi Campbell case. [read post]