Search for: "New v. New"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 166,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
See Young v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 12:57 pm
New York is the nation's leading abuser of eminent domain, and it is a stark example of the excesses of one of the Supreme Court's most reviled decisions: Kelo v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:48 am
Regina (ZO (Somalia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (MM (Burma)) v Same [2010] UKSC 36; [2010] WLR (D) 203 “An asylum seeker who made a new application for asylum after his original application for asylum had finally failed, was entitled to the benefits conferred by the European Directive setting minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:50 am
In Apprendi v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
In Miller v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in F.F. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
Last month we blogged about the Ontario Superior Court’s decision in Coutinho v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 12:28 pm
Commissioner appeared first on New York Tax Attorneys. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 6:39 am
H/t: New York Almanack [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:31 am
Supreme Court decision in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:38 pm
Morgenthau v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In American Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 10:08 am
This case (Serrano v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:03 am
Kato v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:00 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 5:18 am
Facts of Rohrbaugh v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:08 pm
" Here is the abstract: In Booker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:08 am
In Geoffrey William Vines v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2007] NSWCA 75, the New South Wales Court of Appeal partially allowed Vines' appeal against findings that he had breached his duty to act with reasonable care and diligence on certain occasions during the course of AMP's 1998-99 takeover bid for GIO Australia.ASIC has announced that the New South Wales Court of Appeal has ordered that Geoffrey William Vines, a former Chief… [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:14 am
According to the letter, the subpoenas are actually an effort by Exxon to obtain records it could not get by other means.The attorneys general also cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Younger v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:00 am
Further, said the Appellate Division, divisions of DOC required to be contacted during the process of awarding assignments were regularly consulted when the previous order was in effect.The court's decision notes that BCB's determination that the new training requirements contained in the operations order were not a mandatory subject of bargaining was rational and supported by witness testimony about the role seniority played under both the current and previous operations… [read post]
