Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 5601 - 5620
of 6,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm
Again, these are statutory constructions, not constitutional guarantees.As I have documented in God vs. the Gavel: The Perils of Extreme Religious Liberty, there are thousands of statutory exemptions, or “rights,” in the United States that harm others. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:17 pm
Rather that conceptualizing fairness in relation to States (developed v. developing), should we ask what international law can do to protect – or more importantly perhaps – to empower vulnerable communities? [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:59 am
The leading Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:55 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:13 am
As of January 7, 2016, the Lloyd’s website stated that its syndicates ‘compete for business, thus offering choice, flexibility and continuing innovation. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] According to the Washington Post, a March 2017 survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, indicated that 38 percent of workers reported that they did not receive paid jury duty leave. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:31 am
His class was a constant series of political moves that culminated with an end-of-the-semester celebration of United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
If we assume that utility functions yield values expressed in units of utility or utiles, then individual's utility function might score state of affairs P at 80 utiles and state of affairs Q at 120 utiles. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:26 am
In 1989, in Texas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Yet collective action problems, while serious, aren’t the only problems that the United States faces. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
Canada In the case of Zoutman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:28 am
(Konop v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
They and other national and local GOP officials cast their opposition to such measures as an effort to protect personal choice. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
Aguas v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
As the Court of Appeals of Indiana correctly noted, the text message was never authenticated and thus never deemed admissible, and as the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York noted in collecting cases in Benjamin v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:01 pm
United States, 340 F. [read post]
