Search for: "Cook v. Cook"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 5,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2024, 5:00 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 12:52 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
30 Nov 2024, 2:29 pm
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food handling or cooking.[40] What is Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome? [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 10:28 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 7:23 pm
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[39] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
Schwedt v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
Schwedt v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:37 am
” Blumenthal v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 am
The fun and games concerning the General Court's failure in Cases T-253 and 354/09 Wilo v OHIM is/are now over. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
The style of the case is, Hamilton Properties v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:19 am
From McKenna v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
Doesn't sound like the most unnatural, artificial or synthetic process to me; it sounds like cooking. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:58 pm
This sounds plausible, but it isn't difficult to cook up examples where this formula doesn't match our intuitive understanding of harm. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 4:34 am
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
v=7G_a_lyGvs0.) [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:29 pm
(Shout out to you, Bolling v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
See Madey v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 2:30 pm
Panel V: Registered Investment Advisers Ryan Hinson, Regulatory Counsel, SEC, Division of Examinations, Los Angeles Regional Office (Moderator) Aaron DeAngelis, Examination Manager, SEC, Division of Examinations, Philadelphia Regional Office Colin Forbes, Assistant Director, SEC, Division of Enforcement, Boston Regional Office Anna Sandor, Senior Counsel, SEC, Division of Investment Management Jim D’Sidocky, General Counsel & CCO, Sanders Capital, LLC They… [read post]
