Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 5621 - 5640 of 42,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 9:17 am by Daniel Shaviro
But does this really democratize them, even just from the 0.1 percent to the full 10 percent, given under whose direction the well-paid flunkies are laboring? [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:27 am by Jim Sedor
Finley was given a two-year prison term and Bills received a 10-year sentence. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:48 am by John Rubin
Suppose a person is convicted of the misdemeanor of possessing more than 1/2 ounce but no more than 1 1/2 ounces of marijuana, a Class 1 misdemeanor under G.S. 90-95(d)(4). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:48 am by John Rubin
Suppose a person is convicted of the misdemeanor of possessing more than 1/2 ounce but no more than 1 1/2 ounces of marijuana, a Class 1 misdemeanor under G.S. 90-95(d)(4). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 10:27 pm by Leland E. Beck
The rule does not discuss the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)’s previous failed attempt to regulate the practice of law and this rule may suffer a similar fate. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:43 pm by WIMS
An amendment prohibits funding for DoE International Programs in China. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 11:23 am
Some of his work on the subject may be found here.[1] Grant Peck, Thais May Charge Reputed Arms Dealer, Associated Press, March 7, 2008 (available at news.yahoo.com).[2] Id.[3] Id.[4] Id.[5] Id.[6] Id.[7] Id.[8] Id.[9] Id.[10] Extradition Treaty, Dec. 14, 1983, art. 2, para. 1, S. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:41 pm
Last Edition's Most Popular Article When does punishment work? [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:37 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, the request for reimbursement cannot be granted.[2.2] Also, the reason for reimbursement mentioned by the applicant, i.e. that the appeal proceedings could be avoided […] is not valid, because this is not a situation where the EPC provides for reimbursement (Rückzahlungstatbestand).[2.3] Moreover, in the present case, there is also a legal justification for the payment of the appeal fee.[2.3.1] Claim 1 on which the decision of the ED to refuse the grant of a… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
That is why subsection (C)(i) does not infringe the Second Amendment. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:54 pm
Before the 1994 act, the Impact Aid program was run entirely by the DOE, with no statutory guidance, and the DOE calculated equalization using its attendance-based formula. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, this Court holds that AC § 10-131(b) does not implicate the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]