Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 58,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Sewell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
Here is her report:1. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:18 pm
In the case of A.K. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
Boris15 / Shutterstock.com Download the opinion: Gladys Serrano v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 3:40 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 6:38 am
What, then, to make of Smith v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:48 am
In Mahon v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:39 am
In Spencer v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:27 pm
The case, R.R. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:46 am
For example, consider Shiner v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:46 am
For example, consider Shiner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
In Probationer case, said the Commissioner, even allowing the usual five days for mailing, her appeal was not commenced within 30 days of the December 17, 2013 letter notifying her of her termination.Probationer had attempted to explain her delay in commencing the appeal in a letter to the State Education Department’s Office of Counsel indicating that she had written to the State Education Department in May 2014 and received a response in… [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 7:15 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:43 am
Roughly twenty minutes after [RLI] revoked [Banks’] access, [she] sent an email from her RLI account to her personal account with eighty-eight confidential RLI emails attached.RLI Insurance Company v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
" * In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the court said that the threat to file formal disciplinary charges if the employee did not resign does not constitute duress as it is not duress to threaten to do what one has the legal right to do.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_01905.htm===================The Discipline Book, - a concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State. [read post]