Search for: "No Named Defendant"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 57,362
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
Linzy, No. 09-2046 (7th Cir. 04/27/2010) On January 29, 2008, a federal grand jury indicted Defendant Aaron Michael Linzy, Sr. and his co-defendant Jarvell Jones with one count of conspiracy to distribute various controlled substances, namely, crack cocaine, methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (ecstasy), and marijuana (Count I), and one count of unlawful possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, ecstasy, and marijuana (Count II). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Now, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant continues to advertise services under Plaintiff’s name and operated numerous pieces of equipment in interstate commerce which impermissibly bore the trademark owned by Plaintiff. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:44 pm
A confidential informant is used by law enforcement to prosecute defendants when police are unable to secure probable cause for an arrest without the testimony from someone who has directly dealt with the defendant. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Plaintiff's argument that "prevailing in this litigation would be undermined if he were required to reveal his identity," ignores that by prevailing in this litigation, Plaintiff will have proven the defamatory nature of Defendant's previous statements and will likely want to publicize his own name. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:09 am
As the court stated in Metropolitan, "[j]ust as a rose by any other name is still a rose, so a race by any other name is still a race; so much like a race that any damage to vehicles, or personal injury, are outside insurance coverage" (supra at fn 4). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 8:39 am
Patrick Austermuehle of the Firm was named a Rising Star again and has a great deal of experience as a Chicago Defamation Libel and Slander Attorney. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 12:34 pm
Patrick Austermuehle of the Firm was named a Rising Star again and has a great deal of experience as a Chicago restrictive covenant and non-compete agreement Attorney. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:40 am
The Thompsons filed a lawsuit and named Harp, the driver allegedly at fault, and his insurer, State Farm, as defendants. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
Named as defendants are the Indorama licensees, and affiliates, and a U.S. subsidiary, AlphaPet. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:24 pm
Defendants argue that Plaintiff fails to allege that Defendants’ conduct was consumer-oriented. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 8:19 pm
If A transfers an asset to B, or purchases an asset in B's name, there is a presumption that B holds the title to the asset for the benefit of A. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:46 am
Although the defendant was located in Jamaica, the State Attorney's office would not seek extradition of the defendant. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
[Defendant's] assertion that 'the named inventor[s'] own publications [which cite various parts of the alleged prior art publications]' is too vague to satisfy the heightened pleading requirements of Rule 9(b). [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
He got their names to see if there were warrants on them and smelled PCP. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
Yes, what defendant's counsel did in her closing statement was misconduct. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:52 am
On the parties' appeals from their various motions and cross motions for summary judgment, the Fourth Department held: contradicting affidavit and deposition testimony from plaintiff's site project manager and defendants' employees created a question of fact precluding summary judgment on the alleged existence of the defendants' oral agreement to name plaintiff as an additional insured under their commercial general liability policy; as it sounded in… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:02 pm
The parties ultimately negotiated a settlement of the class action; under the terms of the settlement, which covered approximately 170,000 class members, Verizon agreed to reimburse three subclasses of customers various monetary amounts, to donate $1 million to certain designated charities, and to pay named plaintiffs $5000 each as an incentive award. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:16 am
Last Friday, Halloween, the Texas Supreme Court delivered defendants a “treat” in the form of a mandamus opinion articulating the standard for when discovery requests seeking information related to claims other than the plaintiff’s claims crosses the line from seeking relevant information into an impermissible fishing expedition. [read post]
24 May 2019, 12:24 pm
To successfully have pleaded a 2(a) claim, a plaintiff must allege: (1) the defendant’s mark is the same or a close approximation of the name or identity of a person or institution; (2) defendant’s mark would be recognized by purchasers and point uniquely and unmistakably to the person or institution named; (3) that person or institution is not connected to the goods or services under the mark; and (4) such name or identity is of sufficient… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 5:58 am
Feb. 28, 2022), plaintiff was the brother of a patient who had died after a brief stay at defendant nursing home. [read post]
