Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5621 - 5640
of 9,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 12:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:53 am
The statute (Section 2711) defines governmental entity as "a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof." [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
`[T]he defendant bears the initial burden of establ [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:07 am
Lops v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
Schs. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
Relying in part on the recent United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Clapper v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:14 pm
But Ezell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:39 am
Nineteen female employees from eight states filed charges with the EEOC against Sterling on behalf of themselves and similarly situated employees, alleging sex discrimination in pay and/or promotions. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Bobby looked at the recent preliminary determination by the Karzai administration to release 88 detainees without prosecution and against strong protests from the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:41 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 11:30 pm
Such disputes have risen all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am
Cooley Law School v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 3:20 pm
In Hirst v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]
