Search for: "Cook v. Cook"
Results 5641 - 5660
of 5,903
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2024, 5:06 pm
ATF declares that its Final Rule at issue before the Supreme Court in Garland v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
v=7G_a_lyGvs0.) [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:16 pm
JUNE • Miranda v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 12:12 pm
Transgender Employment Discrimination Risks Rising In 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 4:34 am
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Butts v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Employee Becomes Mother’s Primary Caregiver The facts that gave rise to the complaint of discrimination in Cosentino v Octapharma Canada Inc. arose in early 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 7:14 am
Read, Katarína, Malinová, Kasanický Gustáv, and Podhorský Ján. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:37 am
” Blumenthal v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
In 1999, Judge Robert Pratt of the Southern District of Iowa, a courageous jurist whose brilliant opinion in Gall v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
When she lost the burden of proof argument, she was cooked. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Employee Becomes Mother’s Primary Caregiver The facts that gave rise to the complaint of discrimination in Cosentino v Octapharma Canada Inc. arose in early 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Cook). [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
APPELLATE / IP In Coffee Battle (Folgers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:45 pm
This sounds plausible, but it isn't difficult to cook up examples where this formula doesn't match our intuitive understanding of harm. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (Retaliation)Cavalier v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
