Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 5661 - 5680 of 31,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2020, 9:41 am by Joy
This position was considered by Justice Aston in Vanderhoek v Stark, [1999] O.J. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Frank Iacovelli with respect to his alleged acts of child endangerment, child abuse or child molestation. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 9:23 am by Jesse Lamp
Because this presumption does not follow in a same-sex marriage, the court ruled according to Pavan v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:42 pm
The record consists of a separate file for each child. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:59 am by SHG
That Judge Duncan wrote the majority opinion might be explained by his assuming an “expertise” in such issues, much as Justice Harry Blackmun was tasked with writing Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See People v Guzy, 167 AD3d 1230, lv denied 33 NY3d 948** Executive Law § 632-a*** The law, as amended, however, specifically excludes child support and earned income (Executive Law §632-a [1] [c]).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_00011.htm [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See People v Guzy, 167 AD3d 1230, lv denied 33 NY3d 948** Executive Law § 632-a*** The law, as amended, however, specifically excludes child support and earned income (Executive Law §632-a [1] [c]).The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_00011.htm [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada Post Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Reiterating his reasoning in a November preliminary injunction decision, a Missouri federal district judge in W.B. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by The Action Group on Access to Justice
AI technologies are being deployed in the areas of government benefits, public health, education, housing, child welfare, immigration, and numerous criminal justice applications.[1] What’s notable about these examples is that they are the areas of greatest concern to access to justice advocates: “poverty law”, human rights law, child welfare law, criminal law, and refugee/immigration law. [read post]