Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 5661 - 5680
of 8,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2008, 12:25 pm
The Wyeth v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
Rule 65 recognizes that sometimes it is important to be able to get a short-term injunction against people who sure look like they are doing bad things, subject to the right–expressed in Rule 65–of those people to come forward and defend themselves on an expedited basis. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 11:19 am
Ferguson, which deemed the enslavement of black people constitutional during the agriculture era, and Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
I certainly believe that our judiciary should reflect better the changing mores of our times and the constituent peoples of our nation. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:11 am
People whose names were placed on the reserve list should by now have heard whether they've got in or not (if in doubt, email the IPKat here to check). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:03 am
The county employs 240 people and has a fleet of 50 large buses, 10 trolleys and 42 paratransit vans. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 6:36 am
Supreme Court case, Clark v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:34 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The law is California Assembly Bill 5, known as AB5 for short or “the gig worker law. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
However, there are innumerable good reasons why a Phd provides advantages to people seeking law school teaching jobs and their numbers have been growing steadily for several decades. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am
Via Brad Heath, Judge Singal eliminates the “middle man” in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:00 am
For a briefer summary take a look at ACAS’s summary here Here is my take; The Regs apply to people recruited by recruitment agency and employed by them but then sent to work for another business (the end user). [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 1:47 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:59 pm
So we have a key ongoing internal project v. new client project. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm
His apparent feminist awakening didn’t happen in the decade that the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am
Supreme Court in the Lenz v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 8:57 pm
In short, if, for God knows what reason, the Supreme Court justices are sitting in Washington, taking a break from working on their opinions in the Fisher case to read the blog arguments in favor of affirmative action in law review article selection, shouldn't they conclude that Grutter v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:50 am
Unum Group v. [read post]
