Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 5681 - 5700 of 57,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2009, 8:24 am
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this dog bite/personal injury case and its proceedings.) [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:12 am by Moseley Collins
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the participants in this brain injury/auto accident case and its proceedings.) [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The purpose of this action was to set aside an assignment of a mortgage made by the defendant, as trustee; to cancel a certificate and the record of the satisfaction of such mortgage made by the assignee, and recorded in the office of the register of Kings county; to declare the mortgage thus assigned, which was made by the defendant to the co-defendant, a lien upon the mortgaged premises; to reinstate it upon the record; and to foreclose it when thus reinstated. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:58 am
Indeed, for differing policy reasons, other states not only allow jurors to know about the defendant’s insurance coverage, some even allow the insurer to be named as a defendant. [read post]
24 May 2008, 10:15 am
At the point at which Steele asked defendant for permission to search him, Steele testified that, although he had defendant's name, date of birth, and driver license number, he "probably" did not have everything he needed to issue defendant a citation because he did not have defendant's proof of insurance and vehicle registration information. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Steak n Shake alleges that, notwithstanding the termination of the franchise and license agreements, Defendants continue to use the Steak n Shake name and marks in connection with the operation of competitive restaurants at the same locations as their former franchised Steak n Shake restaurants, and to hold their restaurants out to the public as authentic Steak n Shake restaurants. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:18 am
Consequently, the sentencing court committed plain error in allowing to prosecutor to conduct the cross-examination during allocution in contradiction of clear authority, namely Rule 32 and Ward. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Judge Minora noted that a review of the record indicated that the prospective jurors at issue indicated that they did not know the named Defendant doctors but only indicated that they knew or that they or a family member may have been treated by other non-party members of the Defendant medical practice. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:51 am
The plaintiffs, the Department of Information Technology and its Chief Information Officer, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, awarding the named defendant, Computers Plus Center, Inc., $18.3 million on a counterclaim alleging that the department had violated its right to procedural due process. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:14 am
Anyone who is a settling defendant was not named in the complaint is not permitted to be mentioned to the jury on the verdict form. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
 The District Court order stated that there were three possible standards for the removing defendant’s burden of proof. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 3:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
One tabloid paper (whose name does not deserve being mentioned here) described the three high court judges as “enemies of the people”. [read post]
9 May 2010, 8:16 am by Moseley Collins
Miranda Towing has also been named as a defendant and cross-defendant based upon its position as the employer of Mr. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:28 pm
(Please note: the names and locations of all parties have been changed to protect the confidentiality of the proceedings.) [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:02 am by LTA-Editor
They represent a certified class of all current and former student-athletes who “compete on, or competed on, an NCAA Division I . . . men’s basketball [or] . . . football team and whose images, likenesses and/or names may be, or have been, included . . . in game footage or in videogames licensed or sold by Defendants, their co-conspirators, or their licensees. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:26 am by Y. Michael Yin, JD
Among those terms, Defendant received a parcel of land with a requirement to refinance the loan to remove Plaintiff’s name and debt. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 2:11 pm
When the plaintiff was standing in the pool area at the defendant’s home, she was bitten on her ankle by their dog, a cockapoo named Oreo. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:04 am by -
Sarver, for the sole commercial purpose of unjustly enriching the Defendants in the amount of multiple millions of dollars.After unlawfully using Plaintiff’s name and likeness – without his consent – to make, produce, and distribute a movie about the Plaintiff personally, Defendants further violated the law by unlawfully invading Plaintiff’s privacy and defaming the Plaintiff in several scenes of the movie. [read post]