Search for: "State v. White"
Results 5681 - 5700
of 11,814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2019, 11:23 pm
Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:02 am
Under the FLSA (as well as New York State law), only salaried white collar positions may be “exempt,” and thus ineligible for overtime pay under most of the specific exemptions defined by these laws. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:34 am
Take the case of Walker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 1:58 pm
Cerqueira v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:50 am
El Paso Marketing, LP v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 11:30 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 12:09 pm
I just obtained a copy of Judge Cassell's amended order in US v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:00 am
His sexual orientation strikes me as no more relevant to how he will rule than the race of white Supreme Court justices was when (with Thurgood Marshall) they failed to side with white American public opinion and overturned "miscegenation" laws in Loving v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
And in some states, such as New York, this means that a heavily minority prison population ends up padding rural, largely white legislative districts. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:16 am
Opinion below (Second Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of the American Council on Education (in support of petitioner) Amicus brief of the National Federation of State High School Associations (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-290 Name: District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm
United States, 390 U.S. 39, 53 (1968) (privilege available when invoker “is confronted by substantial and ‘real’ . . . hazards of incriminating); Hoffman v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:34 pm
The effect of Article 15 can be seen in the ECJ decisions of SABAM v Scarlet and SABAM v Netlog prohibiting content filtering injunctions, and in Arnold J’s Cartier judgment itself:“If ISPs could be required to block websites without having actual knowledge of infringing activity, that would be tantamount to a general obligation to monitor. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:07 am
Halliburton, Extraterritoriality,Fraud-on-the-Market, Jurisdiction, Omnicare v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Professor Douglas Edlin of Dickinson College convincingly argues that two forms of judicial review existed at the time Marbury v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:44 pm
Bush and Munaf v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 3:24 pm
This effective racial segregation led to the same types of separate and unequal schools held unconstitutional in the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:41 am
Anders Walker explores how three moderate Southern governors formulated masked resistance in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
