Search for: "V Johnson" Results 5681 - 5700 of 11,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Supp.2d 382 (SDNY 2001) and Union Pacific v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
People v Myles, 58 AD3d 889, 890-892 [3d Dept 2009] [a consumer of electricity could be guilty of falsifying business records for bypassing the electric meter, causing it to falsely record the amount of electricity used]; People v Johnson, 39 AD3d 338, 339 [1st Dept 2007] [a co-defendant of public assistance applicant could be guilty of falsifying business records of the agency]; People v Smith, 300 AD2d 1145, 1146 [4th Dept 2002] [defendant could be… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:47 pm
Similar to the Johnson court, albeit in a theft context as opposed to possession, the court in People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The time-bar will not apply where there exists a fraud claim that is in essence “sufficiently distinct” from a claim of legal malpractice (Johnson v Proskauer Rose LLP, 129 AD3d 59, 70 [1st Dept 2015]). [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
(See Matthews v Tufts, 87 NY 568, 570 [1882], citing Van Lieuw v Johnson, Ct App, Mar. 1871 [unreported].) [read post]