Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State"
Results 5701 - 5720
of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2020, 8:27 am
This, in a nutshell, is the question which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) had been required to answer in Constantin Film v YouTube, C-264/19.The referral, which Germany’s Federal Court of Justice had made, focused on the interpretation of Article 8(2)(a) of the Enforcement Directive, a piece of EU legislation adopted in 2004.The background national proceedings had originated from the refusal, by YouTube and its parent company Google, to provide film producer… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
After all, some beneficiaries might not have the resources or the mental capacity to act in their own best interests. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
Abbott Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
In 86 percent of cases, all parties were based in the same EU member state and there are only a few instances in the data set of trade secret litigation with truly cross-border dimensions. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:40 am
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Chief Election Commissioner v Jan Chaukidar has been criticised by many. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:02 am
His article also pointed to Cabrera-Alvares v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:57 am
Date v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 9:50 pm
There have been a few cases this year concerning religion, sexual orientation and the workplace (as a result of the Supreme Court’s 2019 Bostock v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm
She was formally fired a few days later. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Just think of the forthcoming Batman v Superman ... [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:49 pm
FTC v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 4:46 pm
” Kagan v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
The Sun said that the Supreme Court had created a “charter for cheating celebs” – but inexplicably failing to remind its readers that all its “public interest arguments” in favour of publication have been rejected by independent judges. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Washington, stating a big, blunt rule that, with very few qualifications (forfeiture, maybe dying declarations) excludes a significant category of hearsay when offered against an accused, unless the maker of the statement is unavailable and the accused has had an opportunity for confrontation. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am
As the following discussion shows, this is a particularly interesting time in the world of D&O. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Over the past few years, there has been an increased interest in the metaverse (see IPKat posts here) and NFTs, non-fungible tokens (see IPKat posts here).From a trade mark perspective, the appropriate classification of goods and services has also been in the spotlight. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
